Prepared by: Chief Economist Date: July 2025
I. Executive Summary
As of 2025, both Germany and Japan—two of the world’s largest advanced economies—face critical challenges related to demographic change, productivity stagnation, and geopolitical uncertainty. While they share structural similarities as export-oriented, aging societies, their economic strategies and resilience mechanisms diverge notably. This report provides a comprehensive comparison across five key dimensions: macroeconomic performance, industrial structure, labor market dynamics, fiscal and monetary policy, and geoeconomic strategy.
II. Macroeconomic Overview
| Indicator | Germany | Japan |
|---|---|---|
| Nominal GDP (2025 est.) | ~$4.5 trillion (4th globally) | ~$4.2 trillion (5th globally) |
| Real GDP Growth (2025) | +0.6% to +0.8% | +1.0% to +1.2% |
| Inflation Rate (CPI) | ~2.5% | ~2.6% |
| GDP per Capita (USD) | ~$53,000 | ~$33,000 |
Analysis:
Germany maintains a higher per capita output due to its strong industrial base and export-oriented growth. Japan’s economic growth is supported by a resurgence in tourism (inbound travel) and capital investments, though structural deflationary tendencies persist.
III. Industrial Structure and Trade Exposure
| Category | Germany | Japan |
|---|---|---|
| Export Share of GDP | ~45% (Highly export-dependent) | ~18% (More domestic-demand driven) |
| Key Industries | Automotive, Machinery, Chemicals, Energy | Automotive, Electronics, Precision Tools |
| Manufacturing Share of GDP | ~23% | ~20% |
| Service Sector Share | ~69% (EU average) | ~70% (low productivity concerns) |
Analysis:
Germany is deeply integrated into global manufacturing value chains, especially in B2B sectors. Japan has a relatively low export ratio, relying more heavily on domestic consumption and services—sectors with notable productivity inefficiencies.
IV. Labor Market & Productivity
| Indicator | Germany | Japan |
|---|---|---|
| Labor Force (2025) | ~44 million (stable with immigration) | ~66 million (shrinking) |
| Avg. Annual Working Hours | ~1,350 hours | ~1,600 hours |
| Labor Productivity (per hour) | ~$75 (high among OECD) | ~$50 (below OECD average) |
| Unemployment Rate | ~5.5% (structural) | ~2.6% (tight labor market) |
Analysis:
Germany excels in productivity, benefiting from shorter working hours and highly efficient systems. Japan, despite a lower unemployment rate, suffers from underutilization of talent and a higher share of non-regular and elderly workers.
V. Fiscal & Monetary Fundamentals
| Indicator | Germany | Japan |
|---|---|---|
| Fiscal Balance (% of GDP) | ~-2.5% (post-COVID subsidies) | ~-5.0% (chronic deficit) |
| Government Debt (% of GDP) | ~65% (under EU stability rules) | ~260% (highest among advanced economies) |
| Monetary Policy | ECB-led, rates ~4% | Gradual normalization, policy rate ~1% |
| Currency Regime | Euro (no monetary sovereignty) | Yen (full sovereignty) |
Analysis:
Germany remains fiscally disciplined, adhering to the so-called “black zero” principle. Japan, on the other hand, has adopted expansionary fiscal and monetary policies to combat deflation and support domestic demand, resulting in historically high debt levels.
VI. Geoeconomic Strategy and Risks
| Dimension | Germany | Japan |
|---|---|---|
| Geopolitical Risk Exposure | Russia-Ukraine energy shock | China-Taiwan tensions, North Korea |
| U.S. Relationship | Strategic partner with economic friction | Security-dependent, economically aligned |
| China Policy | De-risking but still dependent on trade | Deep economic interdependence, risk-laden |
| Economic Security Policy | Industrial repatriation (EVs, semiconductors) | Legalized strategic material controls |
Analysis:
Germany is undergoing a strategic shift away from Russian energy and toward European industrial sovereignty. Japan is strengthening economic security frameworks, yet remains deeply tied to Chinese trade and investment, posing medium-term geopolitical risk.
VII. Summary Comparison
| Evaluation Dimension | Germany | Japan |
|---|---|---|
| Productivity | ◎ High | △ Low (esp. in services) |
| Export Competitiveness | ◎ Strong | ○ Selective sectors (autos, chips) |
| Fiscal Sustainability | ○ Reasonable | × Weak (high debt load) |
| Labor Market Flexibility | ○ Moderate | △ Rigid and aging |
| Growth Potential | △ Mature economy | △ Population decline but resilient with reform |
VIII. Policy Implications
For Japan:
- Leverage Germany’s strength in productivity by accelerating digitalization and corporate reform.
- Shift from quantity to quality in labor through upskilling and flexible labor market reform.
- Expand export competitiveness by focusing on green tech, advanced manufacturing, and inbound tourism.
For Germany:
- Diversify export markets to reduce vulnerability to global shocks.
- Invest in demographic resilience through targeted immigration and family support.
- Enhance strategic autonomy in critical supply chains and technology sectors.
IX. Conclusion
While Germany and Japan share common challenges as aging, industrialized economies, they diverge in their fiscal discipline, external orientation, and productivity models. Japan’s path to sustained GDP growth requires structural reform, digital innovation, and workforce revitalization. Germany’s challenge lies in balancing its export-reliant model with greater strategic autonomy and demographic renewal.
コメント