Trump’s Middle East Strategy: AI and Data Centers as the New Pillars of Geopolitics

Report
From Saudi Arabia’s Humain projects to the UAE’s 5GW AI campus, explore the tech-driven shift in U.S.–Gulf relations, energy security, and global competition with China.

Executive Summary

The Trump administration’s Middle East policy in its second term has shifted from a purely energy- and security-oriented framework toward one anchored in AI infrastructure and hyperscale data centers.

  • At its core, Washington is leveraging massive Gulf investments in AI compute (Saudi Arabia, UAE) to reinforce alliances, counter China, and bind energy flows to the digital economy .
  • Flagship projects include the 5-gigawatt AI campus in Abu Dhabi (G42-led, with U.S. hyperscaler partners) and Saudi Arabia’s Humain initiative building multiple 100MW data centers stocked with NVIDIA and AMD chips .
  • Policy adjustments—such as loosening export restrictions on GPUs and decoupling Saudi civil nuclear cooperation from Israel normalization—demonstrate a more transactional, “deal-first” approach .

1. Current Developments

  • UAE (Abu Dhabi – G42): Announcement of a 10-square-mile AI campus, scaling to 5GW of compute power. U.S. hyperscalers are expected to operate the facilities, while G42 manages construction. Reports suggest annual imports of up to 500,000 top-tier NVIDIA GPUs .
  • Saudi Arabia (Humain): Launch of a national AI infrastructure company. Initial campuses in Riyadh and Dammam (each up to 100MW), powered by NVIDIA Blackwell and AMD accelerators, with 18,000 units already allocated .
  • U.S.–Saudi Economic Framework: The White House announced a $600B investment package, including $20B from DataVolt into U.S. AI and energy infrastructure .
  • Regulatory Shift: Trump rescinded earlier AI diffusion export rules, easing GPU supply to the Gulf, though conditioned on U.S. monitoring and compliance mechanisms .
  • Nuclear/Energy Diplomacy: The administration is advancing Saudi civilian nuclear cooperation independently of Israeli normalization, breaking with past linkage strategies .

2. Strategic Logic

A. Objectives

  1. Counter China in Tech: Position Gulf AI campuses as hubs for U.S. chip and cloud ecosystems, setting de facto standards .
  2. Alliance Binding: Package defense, nuclear cooperation, and digital infrastructure to deepen economic and security interdependence .
  3. Energy–AI Nexus: Link the Gulf’s cheap energy and transmission assets to AI’s soaring electricity demand .

B. Means

  • Mega-projects (UAE 5GW, Saudi 100MW-class DCs) as tangible anchors.
  • Export regime redesign, enabling GPU supply under U.S. oversight .
  • Capital bundling, channeling Saudi outbound investment into U.S. infrastructure and job creation .

C. Expected Outcomes

  • Short-term: Gulf states emerge as “third-pole compute hubs,” stocked with U.S. GPUs and cloud services.
  • Medium-term: Secondary industries in cooling, grid storage, and semiconductors scale around these hubs.
  • Long-term: Tech-energy-security trilateral order stabilizes, potentially expanding Abraham Accords participation .

3. Risk Factors

  • Deal Finalization Gaps: UAE’s 5GW campus is announced but not fully secured; U.S. agencies scrutinize China’s lingering tech links .
  • Supply Constraints: Physical limits on GPU production, electricity, and water for cooling threaten scalability .
  • Regulatory Backlash: U.S. Congress or security agencies may re-tighten export reviews, slowing project execution .

4. Scenario Outlook

  • Best Case: First gigawatt of UAE campus online, Saudi Humain operational by 2026, cementing a U.S.–Gulf compute corridor.
  • Base Case: Projects proceed gradually with enhanced audit clauses; execution slower but steady.
  • Worst Case: Export or security reviews stall GPU flows; power and cooling constraints shrink ambitions, pushing Gulf states toward Chinese or European alternatives.

5. Strategic Implications

  1. “Geopolitics of Compute” emerges as central: chips, cloud, and compliance define alliances more than oil alone.
  2. Gulf States pivot from energy exporters to AI states, using their capital and electricity as leverage.
  3. Execution risk lies in finalizing contracts and building reliable infrastructure. Governance and monitoring will determine whether these megadeals truly anchor U.S. strategy.
タイトルとURLをコピーしました